Direct Democracy
A system in which citizens decide laws directly through referendums, popular initiatives, assemblies and recall of officials, instead of delegating to representatives, as in the Swiss cantons and classical Athens.
Ownfacet / Politype / Ideologies / Direct Democracy
A system in which citizens decide laws directly through referendums, popular initiatives, assemblies and recall of officials, instead of delegating to representatives, as in the Swiss cantons and classical Athens.
EDITORIAL SUMMARY
I want citizens to decide laws through referendums, popular initiatives and recall of officials, with power decentralized to municipalities and cantons.
Sources below support the specific identity or context claims indicated. They do not validate this profile’s editorial category labels, twelve numerical coordinates, closest matches, or every statement in its description.
Review statuses describe scoped, agent-assisted checks against cited sources. They are not an independent human expert certification.
A documented source review is still pending for this entry. Treat its description and coordinates as an atlas interpretation.
How to interpret catalog profilesPolitical Axes
These coordinates are editorial interpretations. The two pole scores add to 100; they describe a position in this model, rather than a probability. Read how catalog profiles are interpreted ↗
This position is 40.8 points from the median of the 257 ideology profiles in this collection.
This is the largest distance from this collection’s median across the twelve axes. The collection is not a survey of public opinion.
This position is 2.4 points from this collection’s median.
This is the smallest median distance across the twelve axes; it does not establish a historical or political consensus.
Scores below are similarity indices out of 100, calculated from catalog coordinates. They do not establish historical influence or endorsement. How the comparison works ↗

A British philosopher, Berlin distinguished negative from positive liberty and championed value pluralism, warning against totalitarian utopias and becoming a reference of 20th-century liberal thought.
Closest by facet
Each facet compares three axes: governance (power distribution, representation, civil liberties), culture (integration, religion, social norms), or economy (ownership, coordination, trade). Full-profile similarity compares all twelve.



Other nearby figures








Most distant figures
Scores below are similarity indices out of 100, calculated from catalog coordinates. They do not establish historical influence or endorsement. How the comparison works ↗
Related Doctrines
Scores below are similarity indices out of 100, calculated from catalog coordinates. They do not establish historical influence or endorsement. How the comparison works ↗
Most compatible among the 257 schools
Doctrine that organizes the state through a constitutional division of power between a central government and autonomous regional units, such as cantons or states, with their own competencies, independent courts, and mutual checks against excessive concentration of power.
Political position that seeks balance between left and right, valuing moderation, pragmatism, and consensus, and combining elements of different currents to avoid extremes and favor gradual reforms.
Political tradition concerned with self-government, civic participation, the rule of law, and protection against arbitrary power. Contemporary civic republicanism emphasizes freedom as non-domination; historical and modern republican traditions differ on citizenship and institutions.
Most distant ideology
FascismThird position46.5 / 100